TED-Ed. A resource for facilitating learning outside of the classroom?

Working to bring technology into the classroom often feels like a blessing and a headache. As a prof

Pick a new NWACCo theme

A few months ago, after a tele-conference with the nwacco group I embarked upon a quest to find a ne

Do you do video capture?

Question: How do you or your institution use video and audio capture in a blended or online learning

 

TED-Ed. A resource for facilitating learning outside of the classroom?

May 18, 2012 in NWACCo, NWACCo Featured

Working to bring technology into the classroom often feels like a blessing and a headache. As a professor, I continually want to do better, and that includes utilizing technology to effectively further learning goals, outcomes, and classroom organization and management. The University of Portland considers “wanting to do better” a tenet of the reflective teacher  (and I do too); always being willing (and able) to turn inward and examine current practices, traditions, norms, and routines is integral to my teaching practice. I use my Google reader, RSS feed, and email subscriptions to follow blogs and news related to pedagogy and technology to try to manage the headache of keeping up with new technology and ways to implement it. One publication that I follow is The Chronicle of Higher Education’s Wired Campus blog. It is great; its tagline is “the latest news on tech and education.” I recommend it to anyone in the teaching profession at any level. About a month ago, Wired Campus highlighted news about TED (a nonprofit dedicated to showcasing “ideas worth spreading”) finally launching TED-Ed, a portal and YouTube channel specifically designed for teachers and professors to find educational videos to utilize in the classroom. In addition, at the end of April, TED-Ed became its own website where professors may find interactive videos for classroom material. This was intriguing for many reasons, but caught my eye because in our Academic Technology Roundtable meetings we have often discussed the concept of the “flipped classroom,” where professors use technology to teach or lecture or demonstrate outside of the classroom and the classroom becomes more of a place for discussion, group work, and direct interaction because students have received the “lecture” outside of class. I’ve thought about the concept of capturing my lectures on video and having those be the homework students watch before coming to class and then the valuable classroom time becomes a place for more interaction, but I haven’t been able to conceptualize lecturing, or delivering material, without interacting with students through questions and points students bring up during the lecture. However, this new website got me thinking again that perhaps the power wouldn’t be in using my own lectures as outside classroom material, but those of others…that, in fact, students enrolled in my courses could benefit from multiple professor’s expert perspectives on an issue. I already do this to a certain extent, as I bring in outside YouTube videos, current news, etc. to supplement classroom points, but I primarily utilize these resources during class, as I appreciate and see the value in the comments these multimedia and current events often solicit and the discussion they often instigate. So, check it out. Ted-Ed. We always have to be thinking and questioning how we can do better. Perhaps there are some materials on this website worth utilizing to enrich and further learning outside of the classroom.
bschneider

Pick a new NWACCo theme

May 15, 2012 in NWACCo

A few months ago, after a tele-conference with the nwacco group I embarked upon a quest to find a new WordPress theme – I’ve narrowed it down to the following options. I feel they are both scalable, incorporate responsive design, and contain many admin features while still accomplishing a clean magazine news type of  layout. Review the theme [...]
bschneider

Do you do video capture?

May 15, 2012 in NWACCo

Question: How do you or your institution use video and audio capture in a blended or online learning environment. Share examples or comment on your plans in 2012. Some ideas on how you might share your use of video capture: Share a mashup from different instructors highlighting how they used a product. Use video capture to demonstrate how to [...]

Academic Technology Roundtable at UP

May 11, 2012 in NWACCo

University of Portland Academic Technology Roundtable, Interim Report

I Introduction

In spring of 2011, each academic unit decided how to select faculty for the initial Academic Technology Roundtable (ATR).    The Deans collaborated with Academic Technology Services to review more than 40 responses to the call for proposals.    Ten projects, represented by thirteen faculty were selected (see Table A, Project Overview).  Projects were selected based on three criteria:  innovation, scalability and alignment with unit goals.   Projects included:  development of electronic portfolios, analysis of online discourse,  development of digital marketing websites, podcasts (flipped classrooms), online academic resources and online quizzes and math activities. The roundtable met monthly for two-hour lunch meetings throughout the school year from August through April.   The meetings consisted of project updates and discussion, as well as focused conversations regarding pedagogy, assessment and technology.   During the current academic year, 1728 undergraduate and graduate students, (44% of total enrollment) participated in ATR projects.  In April, Faculty completed online surveys regarding all aspects of the ATR project.

II Tentative Findings

“ I learned there is no magic bullet with technology. Every tool has its advantages and disadvantages. Find the ones that fit your pedagogical style and go with them.”

Faculty reported that students’ ability and willingness to adopt new technology and instructional practices is greatly affected by the instructor’s ability to use the technology.   Both a strong sense of confidence and likewise a lack of confidence with a particular tool or practice can negatively impact student adoption.    Faculty felt that student work involving technology should be required and assessed in the same way as other student work.  There should be clear expectations and prompt, appropriate feedback.   In general, both students and faculty prefer tools and practices which are not overly complex which require time away from content (simplicity over complexity).    E-portfolios and online quizzes are effective formative and summative assessment tools that require students to take ownership of their learning.   Students reported enhanced learning through the use of instructional media, as part of instruction and as online resources to support instruction and learning.   Another tentative finding is that students “yearn for more communication with faculty and students in online environments.  Students often feel less inhibited by the informality of online discussions and reflections – and therefore, feel it can create a more rich learning experience.”

III Challenges

“Doing and thinking are not the same. The students have been raised in a technological world, but we found they lack the thinking behind the technology. They want quick results taught in a one-to-one sequential manner.”

Faculty encountered a variety of challenges when implementing the innovative projects.    First, several faculty were surprised by students’ technology skills.    Students had difficulty with basic technology operations, such as file management, learning new applications and navigating through resources.   Faculty also reported that students lacked critical problem solving skills and were challenged to work independently.   With several projects, particularly the e-portfolios, there was a concern about the quality of student work and motivation.   There was a general assumption that students would be able to adopt new technology practices with little support, and that they would be excited and motivated to participate.   Although there were students who were enthusiastic about the projects, this assumption was not realized with the general student population.

In addition to motivating and supporting students to produce quality work in the projects, faculty were also challenged by the time and effort necessary to learn new tools, and to integrate them effectively in their curriculum.   Faculty consistently reported that it was challenging to communicate effectively with their students about the projects and to adhere to project timelines for integration, planning instruction, collecting data and evaluation/analysis.

IV Feedback

“ATR is formal enough to provide support, structure, and focus on innovation, yet informal enough to encourage collaboration, community, and safety.  It is not a competitive environment, which was great for encouraging sharing and concerns about the data collection… Overall, we found it to be a completely empowering space that will reap excellent outcomes for our pedagogy!”

Faculty reported that they did not anticipate the professional development that occurred as a result of the monthly meetings.    There was a sense that the monthly meetings would be to strategize on successful implementation of the projects, when in reality, the meetings involved wide ranging discussions of teaching, learning and the instructional context at UP.   Participants particularly valued the opportunity to engage in academic conversations with faculty from other disciplines.  Faculty reported that the Academic Technology Services staff was available, patient and supportive.    Since there are limited opportunities for faculty to discover and review new tools and practices, there was a suggestion that the roundtable involve more mini-presentations or brief introductions to new tools and strategies.   Most importantly, participants reported that they learned from each other throughout the roundtable experience.   The most effective professional development occurs when faculty teach other faculty, particularly when the experience is situated in a particular instructional context.

Table A: Project Overview

Academic Unit/Faculty Project Title Project Notes
Pamplin School of Business
1. Pete Rooks and Gwynn Klobes  The Use of Electronic Portfolios as Assessment and Communication Tools 475 students created professional e-portfolios in Mahara
2.  Elena K. Bernard  Developing and Implementing an Inbound Marketing Strategy for an Organization with HubSpot Inbound Marketing Platform 28 Digital Marketing students developed websites for local businesses
College of Arts and Sciences
3. Terry Favero Technology Enhanced Learning in the Sciences(Just-in-time teaching, podcasts, web resources) 100 Biology students participated
4. Aaron Wootton Online Mathematics Instruction and Assessment Approximately 150 students per semester use WebWorks in math courses
5. Jennette Lovejoy and Courtney Fletcher Learning, Engagement and Community Building with Digital Natives: A Mixed Method Examination of Online Academic Discourses Approximately 200 students engaged in online discourse as part of this research
School of Nursing
6.  September Nelson Development of a Web-Based Learning Resource Center for the School of Nursing 400+ School of Nursing students have access to the online resource center
7.  Lindsay Kindler Implementation of a Web-Based Virtual Community to Enhance Learning in Nursing 323 students participated in the web-based virtual community
School of Education
8.  Ellyn Lucas Arwood and Sally Hood Competency-Based Portfolio Goes Green in the Diverse Learners Program 42 students created competency-based e-portfolios in Mahara
9.  Eric Anctil Inside the Millennial Teacher’s Toolbox: A Case Study of the Apple iPad as Innovative Teaching Tool in Elementary Classrooms 4 elementary teachers are participating in this on-going project
Library
10. Heidi Senior Digital Content in the Performing Arts 10 students participated, resources available to all UP students

 

Textualities in the digital age (Stanley Fish keynote)

May 4, 2012 in Uncategorized

jwplayer(‘mediaplayer’).setup({
‘id’: ‘playerID’,
‘width’: ’512′,
‘height’: ’384′,
‘file’: ‘http://is-cc-media.uoregon.edu/media/CAS/2012/session3_lo.mp4′,
//’skin’: ‘http://is-cc-media.uoregon.edu/media/jwplayer/skins/glow.zip’,
//’image’: ‘http://media.uoregon.edu/channel/i/uochannel.jpg’,
‘autostart’: ‘false’,
‘allowfullscreen’: ‘true’,
‘players’: [
{type: 'html5'},
{type: 'flash', src: 'http://is-cc-media.uoregon.edu/media/jwplayer/player.swf'},
{type: 'download'}
]
});


2012 Faculty Evaluation of Blackboard

April 28, 2012 in Learning Managment Systems, NWACCo Featured

Satisfied with the Basics: 2012 Faculty Evaluation of Blackboard

Seattle Pacific University 

Janiess Sallee Assistant Director Instructional Technology Services 

David Wicks Assistant Professor, Director Instructional Technology Services 

Seattle Pacific University has used Blackboard as its Learning Management System (LMS) since 1999.    Technology has since rapidly developed and transformed the way in which we learn and teach.  That being the case, Instructional Technology Services (ITS) surveyed full-time and adjunct faculty during February 2012 to assess the needs of faculty and their satisfaction with Blackboard (v. 9.1.6) to help address the following questions:
  • Is Blackboard meeting current instructional needs?
  • Are there areas for improvement within Blackboard that we can pass on to the company?
  • Are there areas in which additional faculty training is needed?
Of the 91 faculty who completed the survey, 85 (93%) are using Blackboard. 70 faculty indicated that they are using Blackboard in the following ways:
  • 96% use Blackboard with their traditional face-to-face courses.
  • 33% use Blackboard with their blended learning courses. Blended learning is a style of teaching that combines “thoughtfully selected and complementary face-to-face and online approaches and technologies” (Garrison & Vaughan, 2008, p. 148) which should result in a reduction of face-to-face class time.
  • 13% teach fully-online courses on Blackboard.
  • 4% use Blackboard for general departmental purposes and not for teaching a specific course.
The 6 (7%) faculty who took the survey but are not using Blackboard indicated they are primarily using email as a tool for communicating with students. Overall, the majority of faculty (74%) who use Blackboard and took the survey were extremely satisfied (12%) or satisfied (62%) with Blackboard.  The remaining 26%  indicated neutrality (20%) or dissatisfaction (6%), and no one was extremely dissatisfied with Blackboard. Faculty appreciate being able to share content, communicate and collaborate with students, and calculate grades on Blackboard. One faculty member writes, “I use Blackboard extensively in all of my classes.  I like that I can post assignments, due dates, announcements, and create wikis for my students to collaborate with me and with each other.” Another shares, “Setting up course ‘shells’ has allowed me to increase collaboration among students who attend at different regional sites.”  Faculty also appreciate some of the newest Blackboard tools: “Grading online is easier now with the ‘Needs Grading’ feature.” Satisfaction with indivual tools witihin Blackboard is difficult to quantify because many of the features are not being used. The majority of professors are primarily using Blackboard to 1) post course content, 2) calculate grades, and 3) communicate with students via the Announcements tool.  Advanced features such as rubrics, wikis, and blogs are not widely used. This raises some questions:
  • Are faculty aware of the advanced features?
  • Do they simply need training on how to use the advanced features?
  • Do they even have a need for the advanced features?
  • Are the tools currently available within Blackboard user-friendly or are they too complex and thereby detering faculty from using them?
  • Instead of focusing on adding more advanced features to its system, should Blackboard work on enhancing existing features?
Further research is needed to determine the answers to these questions. Despite the expressed overall satisfaction in using Blackboard, some faculty are frustrated with the Blackboard user interface: “It is awkward, not user-friendly, and not intuitive.  Many common processes should be done with a single click, but are not.”  In Blackboard’s effort to add new features, faculty share that Blackboard has made processes more complex and time consuming: “…they haven’t seemed to streamline the process for already existing options; at least, not in a noticeable way.”  For example, the Announcements tool used to allow an instructor to simply type a message and click submit to post it.  Now, faculty are forced to choose between “Select Date Restrictions” or “Not Date Restricted” before clicking Submit.  In short, more clicks have been added to what should have remained a simple process. On a larger scale, Blackboard continues to make small changes on how menus are laid out requiring faculty to relearn how to navigate their course sites and thereby generating some frustration.  Faculty also express dissatisfaction with the basic processes of making a course or item within a course available; they would like to accomplish these tasks with a simple click of a button.  They would also like to edit a document directly within Blackboard rather than have to download the item, modify it, and upload it again; they would prefer something more akin to working with a Google document.  Blackboard does offer this feature in a more expensive version of the program. A workaround may be to link to cloud-based documents that can be altered locally. The greatest dissatisfaction expressed by faculty was with Blackboard’s Grade Center: “Setting up Gradebook is too laborious & time-consuming.”  Another participant writes, “Weighted grading in Blackboard is clunky and hard to figure out.”  Others share that the number of clicks it takes to access assignments and download or upload grades is cumbersome.  Faculty would like the Grade Center to function more like Microsoft Excel or Google Docs Spreadsheets where there is more flexibility in freezing panes and filling down scores.  Faculty would also like the option to return an assignment via the Grade Center even if it was not originally submitted that way. ITS will share this valuable feedback with Blackboard, alerting them to the needs of faculty.  ITS will also look to better educate professors on available tools and how those tools may be utilized to enhance instruction. Faculty indicated that they would like specific training on how to use the following tools in or with Blackboard: ITS has created a number of online tutorials and has hosted several workshops on these topics and will continue to expand and improve their documentation, workshops, and just-in-time training.  ITS will also continue to explore technologies that are user-friendly and cost effective to improve the teaching and learning experience for both faculty and students. Thank you to all of the professors who took time to provide feedback for this report. Reference Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education : framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Satisfied with the Basics: 2012 Faculty Evaluation of Blackboard (PDF)

Creative Commons License Satisfied with the Basics: 2012 Faculty Evaluation of Blackboard by Sallee, Janiess & Wicks, David is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Based on a work at davidwicks.org. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://davidwicks.org/about/.

Jo

Useful summary from Blend list-latest ed tech trends

April 3, 2012 in NWACCo

I found this summary of the latest higher ed tech trends so useful I decided to repost it here:

Hey Clark (and everyone) Great video and there’s no arguing that these trends (scalable online programs mastered by for-profits, open educational resources for repurposing, and mobile technologies reshaping how/when we learn) but I’d argue there is an even more perfect storm brewing that’s shaking up our long held institutions (industry). There’s also: * MOOCs – Massive Online Open Courses (and soon full programs) — more than for-profits have mastered online courses, the MOOC movement (George Siemens, Sebastian Thurn formerly at Stanford now at Audacity, Coursera – Stanfords rush to compete with Audacity, Udemy, etc.) have really figured out the design of scaling courses to almost 100,000 students while maintaining high quality. It’s real. * Big Data, Learning Analytics, and Predictive Analytics — For the last decade, we all have ‘saved money’ at the grocery store using our club card which is basically the grocer paying us for our data so they can more effectively target market segments, manage inventory and distribution, mitigate risk, forecast, and develop new business strategies. This is starting to take off in education where we have systems that track student activity, profiles, etc. While there’s all sorts of ethical issues involved, there is enormous opportunity to empower faculty and institutions to be more responsive to student learning needs, enrollment trends, but this will no doubt reshape educational strategies (and empower those who have the data analytics figured out.) * New Credentialing and/or Digital Badges – one reason universities have not changed while every other knowledge-based industry has turned upside down is because we’ve long held a monopoly in our closed system on credentialing (i.e. degrees.) But a new system that opens not just educational resources (OER) but also credentials that employers can really use. Right now, most employers still don’t know what their new employees know or can do, because degrees are too inconsistent from institution to institution. So they’ve had to rely on name brand (ivy league hires only), their own assessments, or luck. Badges will break it down to demonstrable competencies which degrades the value of a degree. * Edupreneurs and Startups – In 2009, when we all were still crying in our beers about the economy, budget cuts (state schools), and shrinking enrollments (private schools), educational startups were reeling in record amounts of venture capital to unapologetically disrupt higher ed. In 2011, over $429-million venture capital sunk into new education startups. * Consumerization – we’ve all seen what the consumerization of IT has done — where new vendors and service providers go straight to the consumer, skipping over an organization’s IT department who long had control over what technology everyone in that organization used. Well, that’s now happening with teaching and learning — thanks to all these new startups. Universities have long had control over what students need to learn. But just like empowered consumers with affordable and powerful technology who ask “who needs our IT division’”, the same consumers will soon be empowered by the startups who provide affordable yet high quality learning and credentials asking “who needs the university.” * New Online Economies – We’re all familiar with the new online platforms that help people help each other (and make money from the connections and transactions) — craigslist, facebook, ebay, airbnb, yelp, etc. The same is starting to happen with education. The truth of the matter is there’s more than just faculty in the world who are experts (or expert enough) to help people learn. Also, digital goods (video lectures, online assessments, etc) unlike material goods, do not follow the standard supply and demand models. They can be replicated and shared in scale without depleting inventory or devaluation. So the whole economics of online learning is vastly different when developed in a networked platform — which is what 90% of the startups are. Online economies disrupting traditional models are analogous to quantumd physics did to newtonian physics. Perhaps the traditional models will still exist in a limited space, just like newtonian laws are not defunked, they’re just vastly limited. If any of this is of interest to you, there’s not a day that goes by where something’s not hitting the news. I’m curating a site devoted to these disruptive trends you’re welcome to follow: http://www.scoop.it/t/higher-education-disrupted-or-disruptor-your-choice Happy Monday. Susan On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Clark Shah-Nelson <clarkshahnelson@gmail.co= m> wrote: > > Hi all, > > In this short video, Sir John Daniels lays out his 3 trends to watch: shift from public HE to private for-profit, OER, and mobile learning. > I found the first section most interesting – the idea that there is higher quality in for-profit online learning due to division of labor and specialization. It seems like most of the press on for-profits in this realm has been on enrollment strategies and financial aid issues rather than the actual quality of the end product – courses and degrees. Do you agree that having individual faculty members handle most aspects of online courses results in low economy of scale and inconsistency in quality? Are there models for course and degree development in some of your institutions which address such concerns? > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DY5UktFLzlyg&feature=3Dyoutu.be > > > > Best, > Clark > > > Clark Shah-Nelson > Sr. Instructional Designer, CTLT > Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health > > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. — Susan Gautsch =95 Pepperdine Bschool eLearning =95             310.568.5663       Some people fixated on making horses run faster, while others went and built a car. Higher Ed: Disrupted or Disruptor. Your Choice. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. –14dae934037345cf8c04bcb4fdc1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey Clark (and everyone)<br><br>Great video and there’s no arguing that= these trends (scalable online programs mastered by for-profits, open educa= tional resources for repurposing, and mobile technologies reshaping how/whe= n we learn) but I’d argue there is an even more perfect storm brewing t= hat’s shaking up our long held institutions (industry). There’s als= o:<br> <br>* MOOCs – Massive Online Open Courses (and soon full programs) — more = than for-profits have mastered online courses, the MOOC movement (George Si= emens,=A0Sebastian=A0Thurn=A0formerly at Stanford now at Audacity, Coursera= – Stanfords rush to compete with Audacity, Udemy, etc.) have really figure= d out the design of scaling courses to almost 100,000 students while mainta= ining high quality. It’s real.=A0<br> <br>* Big Data, Learning Analytics, and Predictive Analytics — For the las= t decade, we all have ‘saved money’ at the grocery store using our = club card which is basically the grocer paying us for our data so they can = more effectively target market segments, manage inventory and distribution,= mitigate risk, forecast, and develop new business strategies. This is star= ting to take off in education where we have systems that track student acti= vity, profiles, etc. While there’s all sorts of ethical issues involved= , there is enormous opportunity to empower faculty and institutions to be m= ore responsive to student learning needs, enrollment trends, but this will = no doubt reshape educational strategies (and empower those who have the dat= a analytics figured out.)=A0<br> <br>* New Credentialing and/or Digital Badges – one reason universities hav= e not changed while every other knowledge-based industry has turned upside = down is because we’ve long held a monopoly in our closed system on cred= entialing (i.e. degrees.) But a new system that opens not just educational = resources (OER) but also credentials that employers can really use. Right n= ow, most employers still don’t know what their new employees know or ca= n do, because degrees are too inconsistent from institution to institution.= So they’ve had to rely on name brand (ivy league hires only), their ow= n assessments, or luck. Badges will break it down to demonstrable competenc= ies which degrades the value of a degree.=A0<br> <br>* Edupreneurs and Startups – In 2009, when we all were still crying in = our beers about the economy, budget cuts (state schools), and shrinking enr= ollments (private schools), educational startups were reeling in record amo= unts of venture capital to unapologetically disrupt higher ed. In 2011, ove= r=A0$429-million venture capital sunk into new education startups.=A0<div> <div> <br>* Consumerization – we’ve all seen what the consumerization of IT h= as done — where new vendors and service providers go straight to the consu= mer, skipping over an organization’s IT department who long had control= over what technology everyone in that organization used. Well, that’s = now happening with teaching and learning — thanks to all these new startup= s. Universities have long had control over what students need to learn. But= just like empowered consumers with affordable and powerful technology who = ask &quot;who needs our IT division’&quot;, the same consumers will soo= n be empowered by the startups who provide affordable yet high quality lear= ning and credentials=A0asking &quot;who needs the university.&quot;=A0</div= > <div><br></div><div>* New Online Economies – We’re all familiar with th= e new online platforms that help people help each other (and make money fro= m the connections and transactions) — craigslist, facebook, ebay, airbnb, = yelp, etc. The same is starting to happen with education. The truth of the = matter is there’s more than just faculty in the world who are experts (= or expert enough) to help people learn. Also, digital goods (video lectures= , online assessments, etc) unlike material goods, do not follow the standar= d supply and demand models. They can be replicated and shared in scale with= out depleting inventory or devaluation. So the whole economics of online le= arning is vastly different when developed in a networked platform — which = is what 90% of the startups are. Online economies disrupting traditional mo= dels are analogous to quantumd physics did to newtonian physics. Perhaps th= e traditional models will still exist in a limited space, just like newtoni= an laws are not defunked, they’re just vastly limited.=A0</div> <div><br></div><div>If any of this is of interest to you, there’s not a= day that goes by where something’s not hitting the news. I’m curat= ing a site devoted to these disruptive trends you’re welcome to follow:= </div> <div><a href=3D”http://www.scoop.it/t/higher-education-disrupted-or-disrupt= or-your-choice”>http://www.scoop.it/t/higher-education-disrupted-or-disrupt= or-your-choice</a></div><div><br></div><div>Happy Monday.</div><div>Susan= =A0</div> <div><br></div><div><br></div><div>On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Clark Sh= ah-Nelson &lt;<a href=3D”mailto:clarkshahnelson@gmail.com” target=3D”_blank= “>clarkshahnelson@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>&gt;<br>&gt; Hi all,<br>&gt;<= br> &gt; In this short video, Sir John Daniels lays out his 3 trends to watch: = shift from public HE to private for-profit, OER, and mobile learning.<br> &gt; I found the first section most interesting – the idea that there is hi= gher quality in for-profit online learning due to division of labor and spe= cialization. =A0It seems like most of the press on for-profits in this real= m has been on enrollment strategies and financial aid issues rather than th= e actual quality of the end product – courses and degrees. Do you agree tha= t having individual faculty members handle most aspects of online courses r= esults in low economy of scale and inconsistency in quality? Are there mode= ls for course and degree development in some of your institutions which add= ress such concerns?<br> &gt;<br>&gt; <a href=3D”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DY5UktFLzlyg&amp;fe= ature=3Dyoutu.be” target=3D”_blank”>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DY5UktF= Lzlyg&amp;feature=3Dyoutu.be</a><br>&gt;<br>&gt;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; Best,<br>&= gt; Clark<br> &gt;<br>&gt;<br> &gt; Clark Shah-Nelson<br>&gt; Sr. Instructional Designer, CTLT<br>&gt; Joh= ns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health<br>&gt;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; ******= **** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constitue= nt Group discussion list can be found at <a href=3D”http://www.educause.edu= /groups/” target=3D”_blank”>http://www.educause.edu/groups/</a>.<br> <br><br><br><br>–<br>Susan Gautsch=A0 =95=A0=A0 Pepperdine Bschool eLearni= ng=A0=A0 =95=A0=A0 <a href=3D”tel:            310.568.5663      ” value=3D”+13105685663″ targ= et=3D”_blank”>310.568.5663</a> =A0 =A0=A0<br><br>Some people fixated on mak= ing horses run faster, while others went and built a car.<br> Higher Ed: Disrupted or Disruptor. Your Choice.<br> <br><br></div></div> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. <p> –14dae934037345cf8c04bcb4fdc1–

the manifesto is going to Vegas

April 3, 2012 in Online Learning

Reblogged from manifesto for teaching online:

Click to visit the original post

and we’re going with it! We’ve been invited to run an afternoon ‘unconference’ workshop at the end of the Sloan-C/MERLOT Emerging Technologies for Online Learning conference in Las Vegas on 27 July. Jen will be there in person, and Hamish, Clara and Sian will be collaborating at a distance.

The workshop will be devoted to working with data crowdsourced during the formal part of the conference.

Read more… 103 more words

I'm looking forward to meeting the online teaching manifesto and Jen Ross in Vegas this summer @et4online. I have heard lots of good things about both of them. We can only hope that our little manifesto will grow up to be like its older sibling. ;-)

Kaltura at University of Portland

March 23, 2012 in NWACCo

Kaltura at UP

Kaltura

After a long and thoughtful process, Academic Technology Services has decided to add a great new tool to our tech arsenal. Kaltura is an open-source video management and publishing suite that will fill a much needed gap in our digital media offerings, allowing the University to provide faculty and students with their own YouTube-esque site enabling them to upload and share videos. In addition, we will integrate Kaltura with a few of our major software platforms on campus like Moodle and WordPress.

With the introduction of our mobile iPad lab, the prevalence of modern mobile devices able to record video, and the ubiquity of online streaming video, professors at the University of Portland have begun to look at in and out-of-class video assignments as a viable means to further creative assignments and projects in the classroom. At first we were able to get by with students and faculty using YouTube but the more people who began using video, the more specific some of their needs became. YouTube is an excellent tool for a very small user-base; ads are expected and somewhat unobtrusive, password-protected content is likely irrelevant, as is the filtering and management of those users’ uploads. As our “video” community has grown, these small annoyances eventually began to create problems and so we needed to look for a better solution.

Using Kaltura we have a much greater control over streaming video content. Video can now be kept behind password protected doors so that only the University community can view it. We can add custom watermarks to videos for the marketing department. We can moderate material that may be deemed inappropriate to the University’s core values. We can also provide this new content in all sorts of formats based on the needs of each project (i.e. 1080p or tablet-optimized resolutions). There are many other great advantages in our move away from a free solution to a stand-alone piece of software and I expect there will be further blog posts with more specific details about some of those. After all we are still learning as we go!

This upcoming week, Sam Williams and myself will be attending the Kaltura DevConnect Conference over on the east coast. We are greatly looking forward to learning different ways that we might further utilize Kaltura in a University environment. Keep an eye out for a future post detailing our findings… it should be good!

Three Free Ubiquitous Apps Professors Need

March 14, 2012 in NWACCo Featured

Three Free Ubiquitous Apps Professors Need Even If They Don’t Have A Smartphone What are important characteristics of a good education app?  Okay, free is good.  I will give you that one. What else?  For me, I love ubiquitous apps, or in other words, programs that work on all my devices, including my phone, my iPad, and my computer.  I also prefer apps that allow me to access my data almost anywhere I go.  For the purposes of this article, the data needs to have a meaningful educational purpose.  Students should see their smart phones as more than just media consumption devices.  The apps need to be easy to use and reliable on a variety of platforms.  Three apps immediately come to mind that fit this description: Evernote, Dropbox, and Readability.  Let’s look at descriptions, suggested uses, possible issues, and alternatives for each of these apps. My first recommendation is Evernote, which is a cloud-based note taking tool that enables your notes to be synchronized between devices and shared with other users.  In addition to conventional note taking,  Evernote can import pictures of notes from a whiteboard using a phone or laptop camera.  Evernote uses OCR technology to import images, making any text on the images searchable and easy to find at a later date.  Notebooks (groups of notes) can be shared with students or colleagues by sending them the notebook’s URL.  The address for a notebook could be posted once in Blackboard at the beginning of a class and students could see new notes as they are added throughout the term. One possible issue is formatting problems that occur when copying and pasting text from another source, such as a Word document. This can be avoided by converting the document to plain text before copying. A possible alternative to Evernote is Microsoft’s OneNote.  Currently OneNote is a better program if you only plan to take notes on a PC. However, Evernote provides a consistent experience across PCs, Macs, and mobile devices which makes it more useful for those of us who want to be productive note takers regardless of the technology we are currently using. The second ubiquitous app I recommend is Dropbox, which is an online file storage tool that can be used to share and back up your documents. A professor might use Dropbox instead of email to share a folder where students submit projects with large file sizes, such as PowerPoint presentations, videos, or images. Students would copy completed projects to the folder and then let the instructor know so the project could be graded.  Dropbox syncs all of the files to a folder on your computer so you do not have to manually download each document.  Another possible use would be to create a folder that contains files that you frequently share with your class. This folder can be made available to students on an as needed basis or can be made public so students can help themselves. It would be nice if Dropbox provided a service where students could email your Dropbox with an assignment.  There is a third party tool that can help you accomplish this (http://ifttt.com/dropbox), but by using it, you give the vendor access to your Dropbox content, probably okay but not preferred.  If your primary use for Dropbox is to back up institutional data, the university’s synching system should be used instead.  There are other file sharing/backup applications, such as SugarSync (https://www.sugarsync.com/), which provide more sophisticated syncing and sharing options.  However, Dropbox’s simplicity and tight integration with your computer’s file management makes it a popular choice and one I recommend. My final suggestion, Readability, allows users to customize online articles they are reading, making these articles ad-free with options to change the font, character size, and background.  Readability can also be used to save and organize articles for reading later. You might want to use Readability to modify educational blogs and web articles so they are easier to read when shown on a data projector in class. You can also use Readability to save web articles that you can read at your convenience on a mobile device, web browser, or even your Kindle. One possible issue you may run into is that not all web pages allow Readability to do its magic. You can tell if this is the case when the Readability page is blank or fails to load.  Alternatives such as ReadItLater and Instapaper can be used to save web pages for later viewing; however, neither has the elegant formatting features of Readability. Evernote, Dropbox, and Readability are all popular in the educational community because they provide much needed solutions for teaching and learning, and they work on almost any device. Educators want cloud-based apps that work across platforms and can be used by educators and students as productivity tools, which helps us all to become better 21st Century learners.